Motorcycle A
2025 Cleveland Ace Tracker 650Cleveland MotorcyclesClassic Motorcycles2025 Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 vs 2017 Yamaha XJR1300
The Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 records a lower weight than the Yamaha XJR1300. The Yamaha XJR1300 has the advantage in recorded power, recorded torque and displacement where both recorded values are available.
Motorcycle B
2017 Yamaha XJR1300Yamaha MotorcyclesClassic MotorcyclesRecorded specification differences
- Manufacturer: Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 Cleveland, Yamaha XJR1300 Yamaha
- Model: Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 Cleveland Ace Tracker 650, Yamaha XJR1300 Yamaha XJR1300
- Year: Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 2025, Yamaha XJR1300 2017
- Displacement: Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 643.7, Yamaha XJR1300 1251
- Power: Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 34.9, Yamaha XJR1300 98
- Torque: Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 45, Yamaha XJR1300 108.4
- Weight: Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 163, Yamaha XJR1300 240
- Seat height: Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 79, Yamaha XJR1300 80
| Spec | Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 | Yamaha XJR1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2025 | 2017 |
| Category | Classic | Classic |
| Displacement | 643.7 | 1251 |
| Power | 34.9 | 98 |
| Torque | 45 | 108.4 |
| Weight | 163 | 240 |
Power
The Yamaha XJR1300 records 98 hp, 63.1 hp (180.8%) more than the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 at 34.9 hp.
Torque
The Yamaha XJR1300 records 108.4 Nm of torque, 63.4 Nm (140.9%) more than the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 at 45 Nm.
Weight
The Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 records a lower wet weight of 163 kg, 77 kg less than the Yamaha XJR1300 at 240 kg.
Displacement
The Yamaha XJR1300 records 1251 cc, 607.3 cc (94.3%) more than the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 at 643.7 cc.
Seat height
The Yamaha XJR1300 has a higher recorded seat height (80) than the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 (79), a difference of 1.
Power-to-weight
The Yamaha XJR1300 has the higher power-to-weight figure at 0.408 hp/kg, compared with 0.214 hp/kg for the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650.
Frequently asked questions
Which motorcycle records more power, the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 or the Yamaha XJR1300?
The Yamaha XJR1300 records 98 hp, 63.1 hp (180.8%) more than the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 at 34.9 hp.
Which motorcycle records more torque, the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 or the Yamaha XJR1300?
The Yamaha XJR1300 records 108.4 Nm of torque, 63.4 Nm (140.9%) more than the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 at 45 Nm.
Which motorcycle records the lower weight, the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 or the Yamaha XJR1300?
The Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 records a lower wet weight of 163 kg, 77 kg less than the Yamaha XJR1300 at 240 kg.
Which motorcycle records larger displacement, the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 or the Yamaha XJR1300?
The Yamaha XJR1300 records 1251 cc, 607.3 cc (94.3%) more than the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 at 643.7 cc.
How do the recorded seat heights of the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 and the Yamaha XJR1300 compare?
The Yamaha XJR1300 has a higher recorded seat height (80) than the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 (79), a difference of 1.
Which motorcycle has the higher power-to-weight figure, the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650 or the Yamaha XJR1300?
The Yamaha XJR1300 has the higher power-to-weight figure at 0.408 hp/kg, compared with 0.214 hp/kg for the Cleveland Ace Tracker 650.
VS
Yamaha XJR1300
2017•Classic
Displacement1251 cc
Power98 hp
Disclaimer: The technical specifications, performance values, ride profile analyses, match scores, and other data presented on this page are compiled for informational purposes and processed through algorithmic calculations. Their source, license, and commercial-use rights are not fully documented. This information does not constitute a definitive, official, or binding reference. Actual values may vary depending on the model year, market, equipment options, riding conditions, and individual use. Before making a purchase decision, we strongly recommend consulting an authorized dealer or the manufacturer for verified and up-to-date specifications. RPMVault assumes no liability for any decisions made based on the information provided on this page.